Current:Home > InvestA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -FutureFinance
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-17 14:07:07
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (7495)
Related
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- A box of 200 mosquitoes did the vaccinating in this malaria trial. That's not a joke!
- Pippa Middleton Makes Rare Public Appearance at King Charles III and Queen Camilla’s Coronation
- Three Sisters And The Fight Against Alzheimer's Disease
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- At Freedom House, these Black men saved lives. Paramedics are book topic
- Let's Bow Down to Princess Charlotte and Kate Middleton's Twinning Moment at King Charles' Coronation
- 2 shot at Maryland cemetery during funeral of 10-year-old murder victim
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Polar Vortex: How the Jet Stream and Climate Change Bring on Cold Snaps
Ranking
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Cuba Gooding Jr. settles lawsuit over New York City rape accusation before trial, court records say
- Remember that looming recession? Not happening, some economists say
- They were turned away from urgent care. The reason? Their car insurance
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- What Chemicals Are Used in Fracking? Industry Discloses Less and Less
- We Can Pull CO2 from Air, But It’s No Silver Bullet for Climate Change, Scientists Warn
- Kate Middleton's Look at King Charles III and Queen Camilla's Coronation Is Fit for a Princess
Recommendation
Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
House Oversight chairman to move ahead with contempt of Congress proceedings against FBI director
Prince Andrew Wears Full Royal Regalia, Prince Harry Remains in a Suit at King Charles III's Coronation
Today’s Climate: June 12-13, 2010
Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
Encore: A new hard hat could help protect workers from on-the-job brain injuries
Today’s Climate: June 17, 2010
3 common thinking traps and how to avoid them, according to a Yale psychologist